Mary Patriot News: Exposing Dangerous Leftist Ideologies While Sharing Real Hope and Change

American Patriot News

Biden Can’t Win: Big Supreme Court Gambit Falls Apart [Video]

Watch/Read More

Biden Can’t Win: Big Supreme Court Gambit Falls Apart

SIGN: Overturn Roe v. Wade at SCOTUS:
Visit Our Website:
Subscribe to Our Channel:
Request Our Legal Assistance:

President Biden created a Supreme Court Commission by executive order in April, which was tasked with examining the impact of adding more Justices to the Supreme Court. The Biden Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court issued an approximately 300-page final report last night that ultimately had zero conclusions. What is the Left doing about it? They are putting forth legislation to expand the Supreme Court before the monumental Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case, which could overturn Roe v. Wade, is decided.

In the report, the Commission stated:

“Although there is widespread agreement among legal scholars that Congress has the constitutional authority to expand the Court’s size, there is profound disagreement over whether Court expansion at this moment in time would be wise. We do not seek to evaluate or judge the weight of any of these arguments, and the Commission takes no position on the wisdom of expansion.”

ACLJ Director of Policy Thann Bennett discussed if he thinks the Court packing legislation will pass:

“Let me first say this, I think if they had the votes in both Chambers, I think they would be taking those votes right now. . . . If it were being called up in the House of Representatives right now, I think they probably do have the votes to pass it. But when you look at the U.S. Senate . . . in a 50/50 divided Senate, I think they have a tall hill to climb. . . . Today, my biggest takeaway on the Judiciary Act and its fate, I actually think the sponsors of that . . . feel like they are in a worse place today because of this report than they were before. Because before this report, they didn’t have to engage the discussion about whether or not there was a valid play for the Judiciary Act, they just had to convince Members to vote for it. Now they sort of have to engage in both conversations, because this report takes so little positions.”

The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a known liberal, is on record agreeing with not packing the Court:

“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time. I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the Court.”

Despite even leaders from the Left having admitted that it is a bad idea to pack the Court, legislation to do exactly that has been introduced in the House and the Senate. We cannot allow the Supreme Court to be politicized and for every President to take office and change the Court to his or her liking.

American Patriot News

Why I'm Leaving YouTube - The Dan Bongino Show® [Video]

Watch us on Rumble at subscribe to the podcast at:iTunes: up to receive Dan's daily email at Dan on Parler @dbongino and on Locals at bongino.locals.comFollow him at:Facebook @dan.bonginoTwitter @dbonginoInstagram @dbongino Email us at

American Patriot News

The Week Where the Left’s Agenda Flounders in Court [Video]

The ACLJ is representing the Heritage Foundation in a new lawsuit challenging the Biden Administration’s vaccine mandate for employers. The mandate has been promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and applies to all employers with 100 or more employees, regardless of whether they work remotely. After OSHA issued this mandate, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal temporarily blocked it. However, all legal challenges have been consolidated at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and President Biden has vowed to continue fighting to implement the mandate. The cases could ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court.SIGN: Stop Biden's Unconstitutional Mandate: Wednesday, the largest abortion case since 1992 was argued at the Supreme Court. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is the case with the potential to overturn Roe v. Wade. This case addressed the Mississippi law that banned abortion after 15 weeks.SIGN: Overturn Roe v. Wade at SCOTUS: Biden Administration is readopting former President Trump’s Remain in Mexico policy starting on Monday. This comes after President Biden stopped this policy on his first day of office and referred to it as “bad policy.”Visit Our Website: to Our Channel: Our Legal Assistance:

American Patriot News

WAROOM: Steve Bannon and James O'Keefe talk about the future of journalism in America [Video]

Donate: emails: StatementInvestigate & expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical & transparent society.Core ValuesMORAL COURAGE - Courage is the virtue that sustains all others. We choose to overcome our fears.WE ARE ALL LEADERS - Turning people into leaders. Completed staff work. Ownership.COLLABORATION - Best not to work in silos. No one individual is as smart as all of us.RESILIENCE - Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. Never, ever, ever give up. We don't let mistakes or setbacks discourage us. Pursue perfection, knowing full well you will never attain it.MISSION DRIVEN - The best people are motivated by purpose. We are passionate and truly believe in our cause. We must be externally focused, not internally focused.MAKE THE STATUS QUO DO THE IMPOSSIBLE - We move mountains. Failure is not an option. We do whatever it takes.THE TIP OF THE SPEAR - We are a loss leader. We do not shy away from conflict or litigation.Ethical ValuesRule #1 – Truth is paramount. Our reporting is fact based with clear and irrefutable video and audio content. Truth is paramount. We never deceive our audience. We do not distort the facts or the context. We do not “selectively edit.”Rule #2 – We do not break the law. We maintain one-party consent when recording someone is inherently moral and ethical. We never record when there is zero-party consent. In areas where we are required to have consent from all parties, we seek legal guidance regarding the expectation of privacy’s impact on our right to record.Rule #3 – We adhere to the 1st Amendment rights of others. During our investigations we do not disrupt the peace. We do not infringe on the 1st Amendment rights of others.Rule #4 – The Zekman Test. The undercover investigations we pursue are judged by us to be of “vital public interest” and “profound importance.” The Zekman Test is our baseline. Undercover investigative reporting is necessary because, “...there’s no other way to get the story...” Whereas the Society of Professional Journalists allows for undercover techniques, if undercover techniques are necessary to expose issues of vital public importance; we believe they are not only allowed but required.Rule #5 – We Protect the Innocent When Possible - Embarrassing private details are not to be investigated. We stay away from irrelevant embarrassingly intimate details about private citizens personal lives. We look for individual wrong-doing and judge its public importance. The irrelevant religious or sexual dispositions of our targets are not to be investigated.Rule #6 – Transparency. Our methods & tactics must be reasonable and defensible. We use the “Twelve Jurors on Our Shoulder” rule. The work has to be done with such a degree of integrity that it can withstand scrutiny in both law & ethics. We are comfortable with transparency. We must be willing to be ready to disclose our methods upon publication.Rule #7 – Verifying and Corroborate Stories – Evaluate impact on third parties and Newsworthiness of Statements Alone.We consistently consider the probable truth or falsity of statements, examine any reasons to doubt the veracity of underlying assertions and whether the assertions are newsworthy. When possible, we will confirm with our subjects that their statements captured on video are accurate & truthful. At the very least, we will give our subjects an opportunity to elaborate and/or respond. In all matters, we rely on the 1st Amendment to protect our ability to publish newsworthy items after our internal deliberations. On whether there is an obligation to ensure the veracity of statements made on video, 1.) consider whether the remarks may potentially impact an innocent third party. (Factors in support of releasing the content) and 2.)The Newsworthiness of the statement alone by itself. (Factors against releasing the content).Rule #8 – Raw Video. In certain circumstances we may release the “raw” video to the press and or the public. But as a rule, we do not.Rule #9 – Subject Anonymity. We investigate & question sources before promising anonymity. Once we confirm, we will do everything in our power to protect the identity of our confidential sources.Rule #10 – Being Accountable. Admit mistakes & correct them promptly.Rule #11 – We do not manufacture content. We do not put words in our investigative subjects' mouths. We do not lead the horse to water. Our purpose is to elicit truth.Rule #12 – With Great Power comes Great Responsibility.