Ukraine Changes the Face of War Forever [Video]

Watch/Read More

Ukraine Changes the Face of War Forever

There’s a powerful David vs. Goliath lesson emerging from Russia’s brazen, unprovoked invasion of Ukraine that should give deep pause to global superpowers who still think they can simply muscle the world into any shape they want.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
Like us on Facebook:
Follow us on Twitter:

Reason is the planet’s leading source of news, politics, and culture from a libertarian perspective. Go to for a point of view you won’t get from legacy media and old left-right opinion magazines.
Every Russian tank that gets fried in Ukraine is sending the message that traditional armies can no longer expect to dominate simply because they have more troops, weapons, and money. Russian armored vehicles are falling victim to Next Generation Light Anti-Tank Weapons (NLAWs), which can be carried by individual soldiers, unslung in seconds, and deployed with little training and fatal accuracy. There are credible reports that Russia has already lost $5 billion worth of military equipment in a month of fighting in Ukraine. The human cost for Russia is even more staggering: Nearly 10,000 soldiers have been killed in action, including at least five generals.

That’s the reality of contemporary warfare: Smaller, nimbler groups fighting back effectively against lumbering, dumb relics of the past. Despite being the fifth largest fighting force on the planet and starting the war with five times the number of active military as Ukraine, Russia has been stymied in what virtually all observers expected to be a cakewalk.

This isn’t to say that Russia isn’t also inflicting massive, horrific violence against Ukraine—or that it won’t prevail in this conflict, especially the longer things drag on. But this war underscores what James Dale Davidson and Lord William Rees-Mogg called the changing “logic of violence” and “the diminishing returns to violence” in their prophetic 1997 book The Sovereign Individual.

As weapons have become smaller, cheaper, more effective, and more widely dispersed, it’s harder and harder for old-style militaries and countries to quickly and effectively achieve their objectives through brute force as they meet resistance at every turn. That resistance includes “information warfare”—which includes hacking and cyber attacks—but also the use of social media, which Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy has excelled at to project an aura of invincibility and to cast the conflict in stark terms of good vs. evil.

This lesson shouldn’t be new to Americans, as our failures over the past two decades in Afghanistan and Iraq underscored the new reality that old-school invasion and occupation is more expensive and temporary than it is quick and effective. But Russia’s incompetence drives home in graphic detail to us—and, one hopes, to the Chinese officials supposedly eyeing an invasion of Taiwan—that even if Goliath does take out David, the price is too high and the victory too transient to bother undertaking.

If the collapse of the Soviet Union—that gargoyle incarnation of belief in top-down authority, power, and decision-making—was the beginning of the end of the 20th century’s romance with the nation-state, then Russia’s blundering in Ukraine and the United States’ mess in central Asia and the Middle East may be its epitaph.

The future belongs not to the ignorant armies of the night who seek to command and control but to those who embrace and empower the decentralization of weapons, technology, information, currency, and individual ingenuity and courage.

Written and narrated by Nick Gillespie. Edited by Regan Taylor.


Dinesh D'Souza's NEW Film - 2000 Mules [Video]

Protect Your Retirement W/ A Gold IRA Gold is Who I Trust ^^^ ️ ️ -----------------------------------------------CHECK OUT my latest MR PEAGAN Comedy Video: REAGAN MERCHANDISE MR REAGAN ON TWITTER! -----------------------------------------------Music by The Passion


Drew Barrymore CANCELLED Over Johnny Depp & Amber Heard Comments? [Video]

Famed actress Drew Barrymore recently made some controversial comments on Anthony Anderson's daytime talk show about the Johnny Depp & Amber Heard trial. The comments did not go over too well with many of her fans and... (CONTINUE READING / SOURCES:–––––––––––––––––––––––🌐 WEBSITE:🧢 MERCH:🇺🇸 WOODEN FLAGS:📰 NEWS:–––––––––––––––––––––––📲 Donate Through PayPal: 📲 Donate Through CashApp: $ABL100📲 Become a Sponsor on Patreon:–––––––––––––––––––––––🔊 PODCAST:


Triple Vaxxed Stephen Colbert Gets Covid Twice In Three Weeks [Video]

Website: https://saltmustflow.comOTHER PLATFORMS:Odysee: SALTY:SubscribeStar: App:$saltmustflowMerchandise: Salty's Channel: by: DreamsIn Your Arms--Disclaimer--These are the opinions and ramblings of a foul-mouthed lunatic. They are for entertainment purposes only and are probably wrong. You listen at your own risk.


The Billionaire & the Technocrat [Video]

Who brings real hope and change, Elon Musk or Barack Obama? has been more effective at driving hope and change?Barack Obama: A political icon and former president with a methodically crafted public persona? Or Elon Musk: An unfettered, polymath, wild card, entrepreneur?Obama and Musk each have lofty ideals, zealous fans, ferocious critics, and cautious optimism about the future."I am more optimistic about the future of America than ever before," Obama told the audience at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.When TED conference head Chris Anderson asked Musk about the future in April, Musk told him that "as long we push hard…and are not complacent…the future's going to be great."They once seemed like natural allies. Musk says he strongly supported Obama for president before the Democratic Party was "hijacked by extremists," and Obama helped make Musk's SpaceX possible by opening up the final frontier to private companies.They're the politician and businessman with the most followers on Twitter. And they've both expressed concerns about the future of speech on the internet in recent weeks, putting forth starkly divergent visions of the future of social media, though only Musk has put his own money on the line.But comparing Obama and Musk ultimately underscores why entrepreneurs, not politicians, are the more effective agents of social change.And that's one reason why Musk's Twitter takeover could be just the wild card American political discourse needs right now.Obama's public persona is carefully stage-managed, while Musk is a publicist's worst nightmare.Obama was a political outsider who used the new tool of social media to overtake and eventually become "the establishment." For Obama, state action is how you change the world for the better.Musk starts companies.Obama mostly failed to limit greenhouse gas emissions through subsidies and regulation. Musk created America's first successful electric car company.Obama backed a failed high-speed rail project. Musk created a company that promises to eliminate congestion by tunneling under America's densest cities and eventually building hyperloop trains.Obama expanded online surveillance, allegedly to make us safer. Musk developed satellite internet technology that could one day help citizens access information censored by authoritarian rulers.There's also a lot to criticize about Musk. There's no honor in slandering a critic as a pedophile or toying with shareholders on Twitter. He has exaggerated both the promise of battery technology and advancements in self-driving cars. His companies have received billions of dollars in tax breaks, subsidies, and other government handouts, which have certainly been a factor in their success.But much of the anger Musk attracts has nothing to do with the help he's received from taxpayers. It's rooted in the belief that under capitalism billionaires have too much power, and that Obama's approach leads to a fairer world.Produced by Zach Weissmueller; graphics by Tomasz Kaye and Nodehaus. Photo credits: Patrick Pleul/dpa/picture-alliance/Newscom; Rafael Ben-Ari/Chameleons Eye/Newscom; Britta Pedersen/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Chris Kleponis - via CNP/Polaris/Newscom; Carol Guzy/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Leigh Vogel/UPI/Newsco; Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/Newscom; Miguel Juarez Lugo/ZUMA Press/Newscom;  Nancy Stone/MCT/Newscom; Rafael Henrique / SOPA Images/Si/Newscom; ROYAL THAI NAVY/UPI/Newscom; Chris Walker/TNS/Newscom; Zakir Hossain Chowdhury/ZUMA Press/Newscom; imageBROKER/Mara Brandl/Newscom